[公告] 發、推文提醒

1.新聞網址︰https://tinyurl.com/5jhs38ak ※ 網址超過一行 請縮網址 ※ https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/07/europe/switzerland-referendum-face-covering-intl/index.html 2.新聞來源︰CNN 3.完整新聞標題 ※ 請完整轉載標題 請勿修改與編排 ※ Switzerland narrowly votes to ban face covering in public 瑞士以微弱多數投票(通過)禁止在公共場所遮蓋臉部(的禁令) 4.完整新聞內容︰ ※ 請完整轉載原文 請勿修改內文與編排 ※ By Ivana Kottasová, CNN Updated 1752 GMT (0152 HKT) March 7, 2021 (CNN)Swiss voters have approved a ban on full facial coverings including niqab and burqa in nearly all public places in a closely contested referendum on Sunday. （美國有線電視新聞網）在周日一場激烈競爭的全民公決中，瑞士選民們批准了 在幾乎所有公共場所 禁止使用包括面紗(尼卡布)和睡袍(波卡)的全臉覆蓋物的1項禁令。 The result means facial covering will be banned in all publicly accessible places, including on the streets, in public offices, on public transport, in restaurants, shops and in the countryside. 這項結果意味著，在所有的公共場所，包括街道、公共辦公室、公共交通工具、餐館、 商店和農村，都將禁止面部遮蓋。 The controversial proposal gained support of 51.21% of voters and the majority of the country's 26 cantons, according to official provisional results published by the federal government. 根據聯邦政府公佈的官方臨時結果，這項有爭議的提案獲得了51.21％的選民和 該國26個州中大多數州的支持。 The only exceptions include places of worship and other sacred sites. Face coverings will also be allowed if worn for health and safety reasons, because of the weather and in situations where it is considered a "local custom" to do so, such as at carnivals, according to the text of the proposal published by the Swiss federal government. 唯一的例外包括禮拜場所和其他聖地。根據瑞士聯邦政府公佈的提案文本，如果出於健康 和安全原因，因為天氣和被視為「當地習俗」的情況下（如狂歡節），也允許戴面罩。 There will be no additional exceptions, for example for tourists, the government document said. 政府文件說，不會有其他例外，例如對於遊客。 The proposal, put forward by several groups including the right wing Swiss People's Party, does not mention Islam specifically, but has been widely referred to as the "burqa ban" in Swiss media. 該提案由包括右翼的瑞士人民黨在內的幾個團體提出，沒有具體提及伊斯蘭教，但在瑞士 媒體上被廣泛稱為"布爾卡(burqa)禁令"。 It has been criticized by a number of Swiss religious organizations and human rights and civic groups, as well as the federal government. The Swiss Council of Religions, which represents all major religious communities in Switzerland, condemned the proposal earlier this year, stressing that the human right to religious freedom also protects religious practices such as dress codes. 它受到一些瑞士宗教組織、人權和民間團體以及聯邦政府的批評。代表瑞士所有主要宗教 團體的瑞士宗教理事會今年早些時候譴責了這一提議，強調宗教自由的人權 也保護著裝 規範等宗教習俗。 The Swiss Federal Council, which serves as the country's federal government, and the Swiss Parliament also rejected the initiative as going too far and advised people to vote against it, according to the government documents. : : : <略,太多了,請自己翻譯> : : : Bans, partials bans and local bans of face coverings are already in place in several European countries, including France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark. France was the first to ban burqas and niqabs in public spaces in 2011. The European Court of Human Rights upheld the ban in 2014. In 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Committee said the ban violates the human rights of Muslim women and risks "confining them to their homes." 包括法國、德國、比利時、荷蘭和丹麥在內的幾個歐洲國家 已經實施了面罩的禁令、部分禁令和地方性的禁令。 2011年，法國率先禁止在公共場所使用波卡和尼卡布。歐洲人權法院於2014年維持了禁令 。2018年，聯合國人權委員會表示，這項禁令侵犯了穆斯林婦女的人權，並有可能「禁閉 她們在家裡」 CNN's Arnaud Siad contributed reporting. 5.附註、心得、想法︰ ※ 40字心得、備註 ※ (1) 翻譯若有誤 請更正 謝謝! 現在是 09:17 (2) 瑞士公投後就得遵守,是嗎? 台灣公投後,"若"不執行公投結果 不會有事,無誤吧? 為什麼會有這種差別? — ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 175.182.39.69 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1615166400.A.803.html

加個"若"字. ※ 編輯: fun5566 (175.182.39.69 臺灣), 03/08/2021 09:39:55